Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPesetsky, David
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-18T13:28:49Z
dc.date.available2010-03-18T13:28:49Z
dc.date.issued2009-10
dc.identifier.issn0140-525X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/52701
dc.description.abstractEvans & Levinson (E&L)advocate taking linguistic diversity at "face value". Their argument consists of a list of diverse phenomena, and the assertion that no non-vacuous theory could possibly uncover a meaningful unity underlying them. I argue, with evidence from Tlingit and Warlpiri, that E&L's list itself should not be taken at face value — and that the actual research record already demonstrates unity amidst diversity.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x09990562en
dc.rightsAttribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unporteden
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en
dc.sourceauthor/dept web pageen
dc.titleAgainst Taking Linguistic Diversity at "Face Value"en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.citationDavid Pesetsky (2009). Against taking linguistic diversity at “face value”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32 , pp 464-465 doi:10.1017/S0140525X09990562en
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.approverPesetsky, David
dc.contributor.mitauthorPesetsky, David
dc.relation.journalBehavioral and Brain Sciencesen
dc.eprint.versionOriginal manuscripten
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalItemen
dspace.orderedauthorsPesetsky, Daviden
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1530-9230
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record