Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkow, Bradford
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-15T16:09:24Z
dc.date.available2010-04-15T16:09:24Z
dc.date.issued2010-01
dc.identifier.issn1533-628X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/53716
dc.description.abstractMaybe there is something rather than nothing because the nothingness force acted on itself, and when the nothing nothings itself it produces something. Robert Nozick suggested this as a candidate explanation of the fact that there is something rather than nothing. If he is right that it is a candidate explanation, we should pay attention: there are not many candidates out there. But his "explanation" looks, instead, like a paradigm case of philosophical nonsense. In this paper I describe a "metaphysical dynamics" that makes sense out of Nozick's apparent nonsense.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherScholarly Publishing Office, University of Michigan Libraryen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3521354.0010.001en
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en
dc.sourceBradford Skowen
dc.titleThe Dynamics of Non-Beingen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.citationSkow, Bradford. “The Dynamics of Non-being.” Philosophers' Imprint 10.1 (2010): 1-14.en
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.approverSkow, Bradford
dc.contributor.mitauthorSkow, Bradford
dc.relation.journalPhilosophers' Imprinten
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden
dspace.orderedauthorsSkow, Bradford
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record