Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBucciarelli, Louis
dc.contributor.authorEarl, Chris
dc.contributor.authorEckert, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorBlackwell, Alan
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-14T15:06:21Z
dc.date.available2010-06-14T15:06:21Z
dc.date.issued2009-02
dc.identifier.issn1531-4790
dc.identifier.issn0747-9360
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/55914
dc.description.abstractThis research is concerned with describing the experience of being a designer and doing design. Many case studies have described individual experiences, both of designers reflecting on their own work, and academic studies of expert design work as performed in a professional context. Such studies are an important component of design research, and provide an essential foundation and sounding board for design theory. Traditionally, this research has concentrated on practice in a particular industry or company, generalizing to an industry sector or designing at large, from a relatively small number of cases. We depart from the common practice by comparing the experience of designers across a very wide range of domains, reported outside of its normal professional context, and in comparison to other design contexts. We report on a series of research workshops, each including several professional designers, initiated with the specific objective of making a comparison across design disciplines. At each workshop, designers presented case study illustrations of their practice for discussion with designers from other disciplines. This paper describes the motivation, methodology, and results of this project. We also propose a novel theoretical basis for our comparative approach, and the implications that this might have for other design research. The nature of our research and findings naturally is quite different from research that focuses on specific design activities. Previous comparative research more often has aimed to establish general criteria for defining concepts and theories, relating core concepts in research and theory-making to designing and designs1 Our aim is not to produce generic findings applying to all cases of design in all circumstances, but rather to develop a rich understanding of recurring behaviors across different domains, even though these might not apply to every process. As a result, comparative design is complementary to research on specific design practice, as well as research that aims to describe design in generic terms.en
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMIT Press Journalsen
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.36en
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en
dc.sourceMIT Pressen
dc.titleWitnesses to Design: A Phenomenology of Comparative Designen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.citationBlackwell, A. F. et al. “Witnesses to Design: A Phenomenology of Comparative Design.” Design Issues 25.1 (2009): 36-47. © 2009 Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. School of Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.approverBucciarelli, Louis
dc.contributor.mitauthorBucciarelli, Louis
dc.relation.journalDesign Issuesen
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden
dspace.orderedauthorsBlackwell, A. F.; Eckert, C. M.; Bucciarelli, L. L.; Earl, C. F.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9488-692X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record