Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWarde, Cardinal
dc.contributor.authorSarciada, Jesus Gimeno
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Horacio Lamela
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-21T12:44:41Z
dc.date.available2010-09-21T12:44:41Z
dc.date.issued2010-04
dc.date.submitted2010-04
dc.identifier.issn0277-786X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58611
dc.description.abstractPulse Coupled Neural Networks are a very useful tool for image processing and visual applications, since it has the advantages of being invariant to image changes as rotation, scale, or certain distortion. Among other characteristics, the PCNN changes a given image input into a temporal representation which can be easily later analyzed for pattern recognition. The structure of a PCNN though, makes it necessary to determine all of its parameters very carefully in order to function optimally, so that the responses to the kind of inputs it will be subjected are clearly discriminated allowing for an easy and fast post-processing yielding useful results. This tweaking of the system is a taxing process. In this paper we analyze and compare two methods for modeling PCNNs. A purely mathematical model is programmed and a similar circuital model is also designed. Both are then used to determine the optimal values of the several parameters of a PCNN: gain, threshold, time constants for feed-in and threshold and linking leading to an optimal design for image recognition. The results are compared for usefulness, accuracy and speed, as well as the performance and time requirements for fast and easy design, thus providing a tool for future ease of management of a PCNN for different tasks.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSPIEen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.850778en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSPIEen_US
dc.subjectPCNNen_US
dc.subjectImage processingen_US
dc.subjectHardware implementationen_US
dc.subjectPulse coupled neural networksen_US
dc.titleOptimization of a Hardware Implementation for Pulse Coupled Neural Networks for Image Applicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSarciada, Jesus Gimeno, Horacio Lamela Rivera, and Cardinal Warde. “Optimization of a hardware implementation for pulse coupled neural networks for image applications.” Independent Component Analyses, Wavelets, Neural Networks, Biosystems, and Nanoengineering VIII. Ed. Harold H. Szu & F. Jack Agee. ©2010 SPIEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.approverWarde, Cardinal
dc.contributor.mitauthorWarde, Cardinal
dc.relation.journalProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering; v.7703en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsGimeno Sarciada, Jesus; Lamela Rivera, Horacio; Warde, Cardinalen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-6883
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record