Commentaries: McCants
Author(s)
McCants, Anne E. C.
DownloadMcCants-2009-Commentaries McCants.pdf (168.6Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Mccants: It has now been more than a half century since the
publication of Hobsbawm’s formulation of the seventeenth century
as a time of crisis. Yet the historical questions that Hobsbawm
raised, and the historiographical solution that he offered,
retain their vitality despite the numerous fierce debates that they
have spawned during the intervening years. Unlike others before
him who had identified the various ills that befell Europeans who
lived at that time, he did not see the seventeenth century as merely
an age visited by the misfortune of numerous, but discrete, crises.
Rather, he argued that it was fundamentally, structurally, a moment
of crisis sui generis. Moreover, in keeping with his Marxist
intellectual foundations, he invested this crisis with a purpose, discarding
the lingering limitations (dare I say shackles?) of the old
feudal order and thereby opening a space for the industrial capitalism
that he understood to be the defining characteristic of the
modern economy.
Date issued
2009-08Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Humanities. History SectionJournal
Journal of Interdisciplinary History
Publisher
MIT Press
Citation
“McCants.” Commentaries in Journal of Interdisciplinary History 40.2 (2009): 295-296. © 2009 Massachusetts Institute of Technology and The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Inc.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
0022-1953
1530-9169