Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeraldi, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorMcAinsh, Andrew D.
dc.contributor.authorRheinbay, Esther
dc.contributor.authorSorger, Peter K.
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-04T19:45:36Z
dc.date.available2010-10-04T19:45:36Z
dc.date.issued2006-03
dc.date.submitted2005-12
dc.identifier.issn1474-760X
dc.identifier.issn1465-6914
dc.identifier.issn1465-6906
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/58854
dc.description.abstractBackground: Kinetochores are large multi-protein structures that assemble on centromeric DNA (CEN DNA) and mediate the binding of chromosomes to microtubules. Comprising 125 base-pairs of CEN DNA and 70 or more protein components, Saccharomyces cerevisiae kinetochores are among the best understood. In contrast, most fungal, plant and animal cells assemble kinetochores on CENs that are longer and more complex, raising the question of whether kinetochore architecture has been conserved through evolution, despite considerable divergence in CEN sequence. Results: Using computational approaches, ranging from sequence similarity searches to hidden Markov model-based modeling, we show that organisms with CENs resembling those in S. cerevisiae (point CENs) are very closely related and that all contain a set of 11 kinetochore proteins not found in organisms with complex CENs. Conversely, organisms with complex CENs (regional CENs) contain proteins seemingly absent from point-CEN organisms. However, at least three quarters of known kinetochore proteins are present in all fungi regardless of CEN organization. At least six of these proteins have previously unidentified human orthologs. When fungi and metazoa are compared, almost all have kinetochores constructed around Spc105 and three conserved multi-protein linker complexes (MIND, COMA, and the NDC80 complex). Conclusion: Our data suggest that critical structural features of kinetochores have been well conserved from yeast to man. Surprisingly, phylogenetic analysis reveals that human kinetochore proteins are as similar in sequence to their yeast counterparts as to presumptive Drosophila melanogaster or Caenorhabditis elegans orthologs. This finding is consistent with evidence that kinetochore proteins have evolved very rapidly relative to components of other complex cellular structures.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJane Coffin Childs Fund for Medical Researchen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Molecular Biology Organizationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant CA84179) (Grant GM51464)en_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-3-r23en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Central Ltden_US
dc.titlePhylogenetic and structural analysis of centromeric DNA and kinetochore proteinsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGenome Biology. 2006 Mar 22;7(3):R23en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMeraldi, Patrick
dc.contributor.mitauthorMcAinsh, Andrew D.
dc.contributor.mitauthorRheinbay, Esther
dc.contributor.mitauthorSorger, Peter K.
dc.relation.journalGenome Biologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.identifier.pmid16563186
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2010-09-03T16:19:07Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderMeraldi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
dspace.orderedauthorsMeraldi, Patrick; McAinsh, AndrewD; Rheinbay, Esther; Sorger, PeterKen
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record