Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBenjamin, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorLieberman, Daniel A.
dc.contributor.authorChang, Maria
dc.contributor.authorOfen, Noa
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield-Gabrieli, Sue
dc.contributor.authorGabrieli, John D. E.
dc.contributor.authorGaab, Nadine
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-13T19:22:43Z
dc.date.available2011-07-13T19:22:43Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.date.submitted2010-02
dc.identifier.issn1662-5161
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/64797
dc.description.abstractThe default mode network (DMN) refers to regional brain activity that is greater during rest periods than during attention-demanding tasks; many studies have reported DMN alterations in patient populations. It has also been shown that the DMN is suppressed by scanner background noise (SBN), which is the noise produced by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). However, it is unclear whether different approaches to “rest” in the noisy MR environment can alter the DMN and constitute a confound in studies investigating the DMN in particular patient populations (e.g., individuals with schizophrenia, Alzheimer’s disease). We examined 27 healthy adult volunteers who completed an fMRI experiment with three different instructions for rest: (1) relax and be still, (2) attend to SBN, or (3) ignore SBN. Region of interest analyses were performed to determine the influence of rest period instructions on core regions of the DMN and DMN regions previously reported to be altered in patients with or at risk for Alzheimer’s disease or schizophrenia. The dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) exhibited greater activity when specific resting instructions were given (i.e., attend to or ignore SBN) compared to when non-specific resting instructions were given. Condition-related differences in connectivity were also observed between regions of the dmPFC and inferior parietal/posterior superior temporal cortex. We conclude that rest period instructions and SBN levels should be carefully considered for fMRI studies on the DMN, especially studies on clinical populations and groups that may have different approaches to rest, such as first-time research participants and children.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Media S.A.en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00218en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceFrontiersen_US
dc.titleThe influence of rest period instructions on the default mode networken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBenjamin, Christopher et al. "The influence of rest period instructions on the default mode network." Frontiers in Human Neuroscience." (2010) 4:218.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.approverGabrieli, John D. E.
dc.contributor.mitauthorGabrieli, John D. E.
dc.contributor.mitauthorOfen, Noa
dc.contributor.mitauthorWhitfield-Gabrieli, Sue
dc.relation.journalFrontiers in Human Neuroscienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsBenjamin, Christopher; Lieberman, Daniel A.; Chang, Maria; Ofen, Noa; Whitfield-Gabrieli, Sue; Gabrieli, John D. E.; Gaab, Nadineen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5966-2242
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1158-5692
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record