On the Ungrammaticality of Remnant Movement in the Derivation of Greenberg's Universal 20
Author(s)
Steddy, Samuel Joseph; Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
DownloadSteddy-2011-On the Ungrammaticality.pdf (969.1Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We propose an analysis that derives Cinque's (2005) typology of linear orders involving a demonstrative, numeral, adjective, and noun through four Optimality Theory constraints requiring leftward alignment of these items. We show that remnant movement is ungrammatical whenever it produces universally suboptimal alignments, compared with remnant-movement-free structures. Any movement is permitted, but only the best alignment configurations surface as grammatical. We also show that Cinque's original analysis must encode the structural derivations of all attested orders as parametric values of the associated languages. Our analysis need not make similar structural stipulations, as the different attested structures emerge from constraint reranking.
Date issued
2011-07Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
Linguistic Inquiry
Publisher
MIT Press
Citation
Steddy, Sam, and Vieri Samek-Lodovici. “On the Ungrammaticality of Remnant Movement in the Derivation of Greenberg’s Universal 20.” Linguistic Inquiry 42 (2011): 445-469. © 2011 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
0024-3892
1530-9150