Reply to Golan et al.: Revisiting the Statistical Analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Confirms That Both Sides Retaliate
Author(s)
Haushofer, Johannes; Biletzki, Anat; Kanwisher, Nancy
DownloadKanwisher-2011-Apr-Reply to Golan and Rosenblatt.pdf (440.1Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We thank Golan and Rosenblatt (1) for their comments on our analysis (2), which we address in turn. First, Golan and Rosenblatt suggest that the time series may be nonstationary (that is, the distribution of the variables in the data may change over time). Our original paper addressed this concern in two ways. First, we tested for stationarity using the standard Dickey Fuller test. The results (table S2 in ref. 2) supported the stationarity hypothesis. Second, we included year dummy variables to control for structural breaks. We chose years rather than political events for these dummy variables to avoid the arbitrariness inherent in the latter approach. Thus, nonstationarity is not a concern for our conclusions. Nevertheless, Golan …
Date issued
2011-04Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences; McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITJournal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Publisher
National Academy of Sciences (U.S.)
Citation
Haushofer, J., A. Biletzki, and N. G. Kanwisher. “Reply to Golan and Rosenblatt: Revisiting the statistical analysis of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict confirms that both sides retaliate.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (2011): E55-E56. ©2011 by the National Academy of Sciences.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
1091-6490