Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRudin, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorWaltz, David
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Roger N.
dc.contributor.authorBoulanger, Albert
dc.contributor.authorSalleb-Aouissi, Ansaf
dc.contributor.authorChow, Maggie
dc.contributor.authorDutta, Haimonti
dc.contributor.authorGross, Philip N.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Bert
dc.contributor.authorIerome, Steve
dc.contributor.authorIsaac, Delfina F.
dc.contributor.authorKressner, Arthur
dc.contributor.authorPassonneau, Rebecca J.
dc.contributor.authorRadeva, Axinia
dc.contributor.authorWu, Leon
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-23T18:08:45Z
dc.date.available2012-01-23T18:08:45Z
dc.date.issued2012-02
dc.date.submitted2011-05
dc.identifier.issn0162-8828
dc.identifier.issn1939-3539
dc.identifier.otherINSPEC Accession Number: 12425409
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68634
dc.description.abstractPower companies can benefit from the use of knowledge discovery methods and statistical machine learning for preventive maintenance. We introduce a general process for transforming historical electrical grid data into models that aim to predict the risk of failures for components and systems. These models can be used directly by power companies to assist with prioritization of maintenance and repair work. Specialized versions of this process are used to produce (1) feeder failure rankings, (2) cable, joint, terminator, and transformer rankings, (3) feeder Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF) estimates, and (4) manhole events vulnerability rankings. The process in its most general form can handle diverse, noisy, sources that are historical (static), semi-real-time, or real-time, incorporates state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms for prioritization (supervised ranking or MTBF), and includes an evaluation of results via cross-validation and blind test. Above and beyond the ranked lists and MTBF estimates are business management interfaces that allow the prediction capability to be integrated directly into corporate planning and decision support; such interfaces rely on several important properties of our general modeling approach: that machine learning features are meaningful to domain experts, that the processing of data is transparent, and that prediction results are accurate enough to support sound decision making. We discuss the challenges in working with historical electrical grid data that were not designed for predictive purposes. The “rawness” of these data contrasts with the accuracy of the statistical models that can be obtained from the process; these models are sufficiently accurate to assist in maintaining New York City's electrical grid.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2011.108en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Rudin via Alex Caracuzzoen_US
dc.titleMachine Learning for the New York City Power Griden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationRudin, Cynthia et al. “Machine Learning for the New York City Power Grid.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34.2 (2012): 328-345.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.approverRudin, Cynthia
dc.contributor.mitauthorRudin, Cynthia
dc.contributor.mitauthorWaltz, David
dc.relation.journalIEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligenceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsRudin, Cynthia; Waltz, David; Anderson, Roger; Boulanger, Albert; Salleb-Aouissi, Ansaf; Chow, Maggie; Dutta, Haimonti; Gross, Philip; Huang, Bert; Ierome, Steveen
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record