Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCooke, Marcus S.
dc.contributor.authorLoft, Steffen
dc.contributor.authorOlinski, Ryszard
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Mark D.
dc.contributor.authorBialkowski, Karol
dc.contributor.authorWagner, J. Richard
dc.contributor.authorDedon, Peter C.
dc.contributor.authorMoller, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGreenberg, Marc M.
dc.contributor.authorCadet, Jean
dc.date.accessioned2012-02-15T14:00:08Z
dc.date.available2012-02-15T14:00:08Z
dc.date.issued2010-04
dc.date.submitted2009-11
dc.identifier.issn0893-228X
dc.identifier.issn1520-5010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/69105
dc.descriptionLetters to the Editoren_US
dc.description.abstractDespite being a relatively young field, the study of oxidative stress has attracted huge interest. With the advent of simple and relatively inexpensive assays (sometimes from commercial suppliers), a growing number of groups have been able to assess oxidatively generated DNA damage in mammalian cells. While this is good for raising the profile of the field of oxidative stress research, it has led to an increasing number of issues when the work is written up for publication and included in grant applications. In particular, it is evident to experts in the field, editors and referees alike, that there is often uncertainty concerning what is appropriate and accurate terminology, when describing studies concerning the effects of oxidatively generated DNA damage. For this reason, we wish to raise a number of points for discussion, incorporating our recommendations on this subject. The aim is to support those embarking on studies involving oxidatively generated damage to DNA nucleobases and to produce greater uniformity across the field. We do not wish to be dogmatic, but to present a well-argued rationale for our recommendations.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Societyen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/tx1000706en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Dedon via Howard Silveren_US
dc.titleRecommendations for Standardized Description of and Nomenclature Concerning Oxidatively Damaged Nucleobases in DNAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationCooke, Marcus S. et al. “Recommendations for Standardized Description of and Nomenclature Concerning Oxidatively Damaged Nucleobases in DNA.” Chemical Research in Toxicology 23.4 (2010): 705-707.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.approverDedon, Peter C.
dc.contributor.mitauthorDedon, Peter C.
dc.relation.journalChemical Research in Toxicologyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsCooke, Marcus S.; Loft, Steffen; Olinski, Ryszard; Evans, Mark D.; Bialkowski, Karol; Wagner, J. Richard; Dedon, Peter C.; Møller, Peter; Greenberg, Marc M.; Cadet, Jeanen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0011-3067
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record