Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Sayan
dc.contributor.authorYurkovetsky, Zoya
dc.contributor.authorClyde, Merlise
dc.contributor.authorMarks, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.authorLokshin, Anna E.
dc.contributor.authorLo, Joseph Y.
dc.contributor.authorJesneck, Jonathan Lee
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-09T19:34:42Z
dc.date.available2012-03-09T19:34:42Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.date.submitted2008-09
dc.identifier.issn1471-2407
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/69635
dc.description.abstractBackground Because screening mammography for breast cancer is less effective for premenopausal women, we investigated the feasibility of a diagnostic blood test using serum proteins. Methods This study used a set of 98 serum proteins and chose diagnostically relevant subsets via various feature-selection techniques. Because of significant noise in the data set, we applied iterated Bayesian model averaging to account for model selection uncertainty and to improve generalization performance. We assessed generalization performance using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results The classifiers were able to distinguish normal tissue from breast cancer with a classification performance of AUC = 0.82 ± 0.04 with the proteins MIF, MMP-9, and MPO. The classifiers distinguished normal tissue from benign lesions similarly at AUC = 0.80 ± 0.05. However, the serum proteins of benign and malignant lesions were indistinguishable (AUC = 0.55 ± 0.06). The classification tasks of normal vs. cancer and normal vs. benign selected the same top feature: MIF, which suggests that the biomarkers indicated inflammatory response rather than cancer. Conclusion Overall, the selected serum proteins showed moderate ability for detecting lesions. However, they are probably more indicative of secondary effects such as inflammation rather than specific for malignancy.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Dept. of Defense. Breast Cancer Research Program (Grant No. W81XWH-05-1-0292)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01 CA-112437-01)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (NIH CA 84955)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer (Biomed Central Ltd.)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-9-164en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0en_US
dc.sourceBioMed Centralen_US
dc.titleDo serum biomarkers really measure breast cancer?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationJesneck, Jonathan L et al. “Do Serum Biomarkers Really Measure Breast Cancer?” BMC Cancer 9.1 (2009): 164. Web. 9 Mar. 2012.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Manufacturing and Productivityen_US
dc.contributor.approverJesneck, Jonathan
dc.contributor.mitauthorJesneck, Jonathan Lee
dc.relation.journalBMC Canceren_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsJesneck, Jonathan L; Mukherjee, Sayan; Yurkovetsky, Zoya; Clyde, Merlise; Marks, Jeffrey R; Lokshin, Anna E; Lo, Joseph Yen
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record