Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPei, Pamela Pen-Erh
dc.contributor.authorSimchi-Levi, David
dc.contributor.authorTunca, Tunay I.
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-04T15:13:51Z
dc.date.available2012-04-04T15:13:51Z
dc.date.issued2011-06
dc.date.submitted2010-08
dc.identifier.issn0030-364X
dc.identifier.issn1526-5463
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/69921
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the structure and pricing of option contracts for an industrial good in the presence of spot trading. We combine the analysis of spot trading and buyers' disparate private valuations for different suppliers' products, and we jointly endogenize the determination of three major dimensions in contract design: (i) sales contracts versus options contracts, (ii) flat-price versus volume-dependent contracts, and (iii) volume discounts versus volume premia. We build a model in which a supplier of an industrial good transacts with a manufacturer who uses the supplier's product to produce an end good with an uncertain demand. We show that, consistent with industry observations, volume-dependent optimal sales contracts always demonstrate volume discounts (i.e., involve concave pricing). However, options are more complex agreements, and optimal option contracts can involve both volume discounts and volume premia. Three major contract structures commonly emerge in optimality. First, if the seller has a high discount rate relative to the buyer and the seller's production costs or the production capacity is low, the optimal contracts tend to be flat-price sales contracts. Second, when the seller has a relatively high discount rate compared to the buyer but production costs or production capacity are high, the optimal contracts are sales contracts with volume discounts. Third, if the buyer's discount rate is high relative to the seller's, then the optimal contracts tend to be volume-dependent options contracts and can involve both volume discounts and volume premia. However, when the seller's production capacity is sufficiently low, it is possible to observe flat-price option contracts. Furthermore, we provide links between production and spot market characteristics, contract design, and efficiency.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (contract CMMI-0758069)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (contract DMI-0245352)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute for Operations Research and the Management Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1100.0905en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceSimchi-Levi via Anne Grahamen_US
dc.titleSourcing Flexibility, Spot Trading, and Procurement Contract Structureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPei, P. P.-E., D. Simchi-Levi, and T. I. Tunca. “Sourcing Flexibility, Spot Trading, and Procurement Contract Structure.” Operations Research 59.3 (2011): 578–601.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Operations Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.approverSimchi-Levi, David
dc.contributor.mitauthorSimchi-Levi, David
dc.relation.journalOperations Researchen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsPei, P. P.-E.; Simchi-Levi, D.; Tunca, T. I.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-1519
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record