On the characterization of alternatives
Author(s)
Fox, Daniel; Katzir, Roni
DownloadFox-On the Characterization of Alternatives.pdf (139.7Kb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
We present an argument for revising the theory of alternatives for Scalar Implicatures and for Association with Focus. We argue that in both cases the alternatives are determined in the same way, as a contextual restriction of the focus value of the sentence, which, in turn, is defined in structure-sensitive terms. We provide evidence that contextual restriction is subject to a constraint that prevents it from discriminating between alternatives when they stand in a particular logical relationship with the assertion or the prejacent, a relationship that we refer to as symmetry. Due to this constraint on contextual restriction, discriminating between alternatives in cases of symmetry becomes the task of focus values. This conclusion is incompatible with standard type-theoretic definitions of focus values, motivating our structure-sensitive definition instead.
Date issued
2011-02Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
Natural Language Semantics
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Citation
Fox, Danny, and Roni Katzir. “On the Characterization of Alternatives.” Natural Language Semantics 19.1 (2011): 87–107. Web. 4 May 2012. © 2011 Springer-Verlag
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0925-854X
1572-865X