Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMikaelian, Tsoline
dc.contributor.authorNightingale, Deborah J.
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Donna H.
dc.contributor.authorHastings, Daniel E.
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-17T15:17:25Z
dc.date.available2012-05-17T15:17:25Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.date.submitted2010-09
dc.identifier.issn0018-9391
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/70874
dc.description.abstractUncertaintymanagement is crucial for achieving high performance in enterprises that develop or operate complex engineering systems. This study focuses on flexibility as a means of managing uncertainties and builds upon real options analysis (ROA) that provides a foundation for quantifying the value of flexibility. ROA has found widespread applications ranging from strategic investments to product design. However, these applications are often isolated to specific domains. Furthermore, ROA is focused on valuation, rather than the identification of real options. In this paper, we introduce a framework for holistic consideration of real options in an enterprise context. First, to enable a holistic approach, we use a generalized enterprise architecture framework that considers eight views: strategy, policy, organization, process, product, service, knowledge, and information technology (IT). This expands upon the classical IT-centric view of enterprise architecture. Second, we characterize a real option as a mechanism and type. This characterization disambiguates among mechanisms that enable flexibility and types of flexibility to manage uncertainties. Third, we propose mapping of mechanisms and types to the enterprise architecture views.We leverage this mapping in an integrated real options framework and demonstrate its benefit over the traditional localized approach to ROA.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSingapore. Defence Science & Technology Agencyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSingapore. DSO National Laboratoriesen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tem.2010.2093146en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceHastings via Angie Locknaren_US
dc.titleReal Options in Enterprise Architecture: A Holistic Mapping of Mechanisms and Types for Uncertainty Managementen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMikaelian, Tsoline et al. “Real Options in Enterprise Architecture: A Holistic Mapping of Mechanisms and Types for Uncertainty Management.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 58.3 (2011): 457-470. © 2010 IEEEen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Sociotechnical Systems Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.approverHastings, Daniel E.
dc.contributor.mitauthorMikaelian, Tsoline
dc.contributor.mitauthorNightingale, Deborah J.
dc.contributor.mitauthorRhodes, Donna H.
dc.contributor.mitauthorHastings, Daniel E.
dc.relation.journalIEEE Transactions on Engineering Managementen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsMikaelian, Tsoline; Nightingale, Deborah J.; Rhodes, Donna H.; Hastings, Daniel E.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1907-0717
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4421-5110
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record