Pitfalls of Participatory Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Education in India
Author(s)
Banerji, Rukmini; Khemani, Stuti; Banerjee, Abhijit; Duflo, Esther; Glennerster, Rachel
DownloadBanerjee_Pitfalls of.pdf (339.6Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Participation of beneficiaries in the monitoring of public services is increasingly seen as a key to improving their quality. We conducted a randomized evaluation of three interventions to encourage beneficiaries' participation to India: providing information on existing institutions, training community members in a testing tool for children, and training volunteers to hold remedial reading camps. These interventions had no impact on community involvement, teacher effort, or learning outcomes inside the school. However, in the third intervention, youth volunteered to teach camps, and children who attended substantially improved their reading skills. This suggests that citizens face constraints in influencing public services. (JEL H52, I21, I28, O15)
Description
To comment on this article in the online discussion forum, or to view additional materials, visit the articles page at http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/pol.2.1.1.
Date issued
2010-02Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biology; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics; Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Journal
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy
Publisher
American Economic Association
Citation
Banerjee, Abhijit V et al. “Pitfalls of Participatory Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Education in India.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 2.1 (2010): 1–30. Web. 24 May 2012. © 2010 American Economic Association
Version: Final published version