Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrogan, Paul Thomas
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqi, Afreen
dc.contributor.authorde Weck, Olivier L.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-27T19:51:40Z
dc.date.available2012-06-27T19:51:40Z
dc.date.issued2011-08
dc.date.submitted2010-10
dc.identifier.issn0022-4650
dc.identifier.otherAIAA Paper 2010-8805
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/71231
dc.descriptionhttp://www1.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=318, Presented at the AIAA Space 2010 Conference and ExhibitionAnaheim, CA, 30 August–2 September 2010.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents matrix-based methods for determining optimal cargo manifests for space exploration. An exploration system is defined as a sequence of in-space and on-surface transports between multiple nodes coupled with demands for resources. The goal is to maximize value and robustness of exploration while satisfying logistical demands and physical constraints at all times. To reduce problem complexity, demands are abstracted to a single class of resources, and one metric (e.g., mass or volume) governs capacity limits. Matrices represent cargo carried by transports, cargo used to satisfy demands, and cargo transferred to other transports. A system of equations enforces flow conservation, demand satisfaction, and capacity constraints. Exploration system feasibility is evaluated by determining if a solution exists to a linear program or network-flow problem. Manifests are optimized subject to an objective function using linear or nonlinear programming techniques. In addition to modeling the manifesting problem, a few metrics such as the transport criticality index are formulated to enable analysis and interpretation. The proposed matrix manifest modeling methods are demonstrated with a notional lunar exploration system composed of 32 transports, including eight cargo and nine crewed landings at an outpost at the lunar south pole and several surface excursions to Malapert Crater and Schrödinger Basin. It is found that carry-along and prepositioning logistics strategies yield different manifesting solutions in which transport criticality varies. For the lunar scenario, transport criticality is larger for a prepositioning strategy (mean value of 3.02), as compared with an alternative carry-along case (mean value of 1.99).en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www1.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=jaPaper&gid=51870en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleMatrix Methods for Optimal Manifesting of Multinode Space Exploration Systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationGrogan, Paul T., Afreen Sidiqi and Olivier L. de Weck. "Matrix Methods for Optimal Manifesting of Multinode Space Exploration Systems." Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 2011, vol.48 no.4 (679-690).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.approverde Weck, Olivier L.
dc.contributor.mitauthorGrogan, Paul Thomas
dc.contributor.mitauthorSiddiqi, Afreen
dc.contributor.mitauthorde Weck, Olivier L.
dc.relation.journalJournal of Spacecraft and Rocketsen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
dspace.orderedauthorsGrogan, Paul T.; Siddiqi, Afreen; de Weck, Olivier L.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6677-383X
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8986-4806
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record