Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence
Author(s)
Costinot, Arnaud; Donaldson, David John
DownloadCostinot_Ricardo's Theory.pdf (587.6Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
When asked to name one proposition in the social sciences that is both true and non-trivial, Paul Samuelson famously replied: 'Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage'. Truth, however, in Samuelson's reply refers to the fact that Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage is mathematically correct, not that it is empirically valid. In this paper we develop and implement an empirical test of Ricardo's ideas. We use novel agricultural data that describe the productivity in 17 crops of 1.6 million parcels of land in 55 countries around the world. We find that a regression of log observed output on log predicted output has a (precisely estimated) slope of 0.84 and an R-squared of 0.93. In our view, these findings offer considerable support for Ricardo's ideas.
Date issued
2012-05Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of EconomicsJournal
American Economic Review
Publisher
American Economic Association
Citation
Costinot, Arnaud, and Dave Donaldson. “Ricardo’s Theory of Comparative Advantage: Old Idea, New Evidence.” American Economic Review 102.3 (2012): 453–458. © 2012 AEA
Version: Final published version
ISSN
0002-8282
1944-7981