Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuggins, David J.
dc.contributor.authorSherman, Woody
dc.contributor.authorTidor, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-02T15:15:23Z
dc.date.available2012-10-02T15:15:23Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.date.submitted2011-08
dc.identifier.issn0022-2623
dc.identifier.issn1520-4804
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73545
dc.description.abstractAppropriate tuning of binding selectivity is a primary objective in the discovery and optimization of a compound on the path toward developing a drug. The environment in which drugs act is complex, with many potential interaction partners. Proteins, DNA, RNA, lipids, sugars, metabolites, and other small molecules all have the potential to interact with a drug, and in many cases these unexpected interactions lead to undesired and often severe side effects. Conversely, the ability to interact with multiple targets or drug resistance mutants can be advantageous in certain contexts. Designing a drug with the appropriate balance of avoidance of undesirable targets (narrow selectivity) and coverage of one or more targets of interest (broad selectivity, also referred to as promiscuity) is a continual drug development challenge. In many cases this objective is attained through trial and error, but there are rational approaches that can guide the tuning of selectivity, and examples have been published that illustrate a number of generalizable strategies. In this review, we discuss fundamental principles that account for selectivity and highlight examples where selectivity has been attained through rational design. An understanding of the general principles that drive selectivity should allow for more efficient design of compounds with desirable selectivity profiles.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant GM082209)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant GM065418)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jm2010332en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourcePubMed Centralen_US
dc.titleRational Approaches to Improving Selectivity in Drug Designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHuggins, David J., Woody Sherman, and Bruce Tidor. “Rational Approaches to Improving Selectivity in Drug Design.” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 55.4 (2012): 1424–1444. Copyright © 2012 American Chemical Societyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Researchen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorTidor, Bruce
dc.relation.journalJournal of Medicinal Chemistryen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsHuggins, David J.; Sherman, Woody; Tidor, Bruceen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-3969
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record