Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSkow, Bradford
dc.date.accessioned2012-10-03T15:23:12Z
dc.date.available2012-10-03T15:23:12Z
dc.date.issued2011-12
dc.identifier.issn2153-9596
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/73563
dc.description.abstractAnti-haecceitism is the thesis that the universe could not be nonqualitatively different without being qualitatively different. Haecceitism is the denial of anti-haecceitism.1 In “Haecceitism, Anti-Haecceitism, and Possible Worlds” (Skow 2008), I argued that there are no nontendentious definitions of “haecceitism” and “anti-haecceitism” using possible-worlds talk. For any candidate definition of “anti-haecceitism” that uses possible-worlds talk, there is some theory of possible worlds relative to which that definition is not equivalent to anti-haecceitism.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-960X.2011.00533.xen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleMore on Haecceitism and Possible Worldsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSkow, Bradford. “MORE ON HAECCEITISM AND POSSIBLE WORLDS.” Analytic Philosophy 52.4 (2011): 267–269.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorSkow, Bradford
dc.relation.journalAnalytic Philosophyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsSKOW, BRADFORDen
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-4540
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record