Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKahl, Steven J.
dc.contributor.authorLiegel, Gregory J.
dc.contributor.authorYates, JoAnne
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-06T20:45:51Z
dc.date.available2012-11-06T20:45:51Z
dc.date.issued2012-01
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-78190-024-6
dc.identifier.issn0742-3322
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/74580
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The broader aim of this research is twofold. First, we aim to better understand how the business computer was conceptualized and used within U.S. industry. Second, this research investigates the role of social factors such as relational structure, institutional entrepreneurs, and position in the formation of conceptualizations of new technologies. Design/methodological/approach – This paper is theoretically motivated in the sense that it responds to the lack of attention to the failure of institutional entrepreneurs to change belief systems. Through detailed archival, network, and descriptive statistical analysis, the paper shows how the failed institutional entrepreneur fits conventional explanations for success. The paper then analyzes two matched cases, comparing the insurance industry's rejection of the institutional entrepreneur with manufacturing's acceptance, in order to identify what is missing in current explanations of institutional entrepreneurs. Findings – Our analysis reveals that the role of the audience structure in interpreting the institutional entrepreneur's message influences the change outcome. In our case, the institutional entrepreneur's view of the computer as a brain that supported decision-oriented applications did not fit with views of the insurance groups who had centralized authority over interpreting the computer. Because manufacturing had less centralized control in its discourse around the computer, there were fewer constraints on assimilation, allowing the entrepreneur's views to resonate with some of the occupational groups. Research limitations/implications – This paper develops a theoretical approach to institutional entrepreneurship that situates the entrepreneurial efforts of individual actors within a system characterized by the structure of its audience and subject to distinct historical macro-structural processes that present significant obstacles to the realization of their entrepreneurial projects.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S0742-3322(2012)0000029013en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Yates via Alex C.en_US
dc.titleAudience Structure and the Failure of Institutional Entrepreneurshipen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKahl, Steven J., Gregory J. Liegel, and JoAnne Yates (2012), Audience Structure and the Failure of Institutional Entrepreneurship, in Steven J. Kahl, Brian S. Silverman, Michael A. Cusumano (ed.) History and Strategy (Advances in Strategic Management, Volume 29), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.275-313.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.approverYates, JoAnne
dc.contributor.mitauthorYates, JoAnne
dc.relation.journalAdvances in Strategic Managementen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsKahl, Steven J.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3841-9256
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record