Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeyton, Shelly R.
dc.contributor.authorKalcioglu, Zeynep Ilke
dc.contributor.authorCohen, Joshua C.
dc.contributor.authorRunkle, Anne P.
dc.contributor.authorVan Vliet, Krystyn J
dc.contributor.authorLauffenburger, Douglas A
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Linda G
dc.date.accessioned2012-12-18T16:43:46Z
dc.date.available2012-12-18T16:43:46Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.date.submitted2010-11
dc.identifier.issn0006-3592
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/75767
dc.descriptionAuthor Manuscript 2012 May 21.en_US
dc.description.abstractDesign of 3D scaffolds that can facilitate proper survival, proliferation, and differentiation of progenitor cells is a challenge for clinical applications involving large connective tissue defects. Cell migration within such scaffolds is a critical process governing tissue integration. Here, we examine effects of scaffold pore diameter, in concert with matrix stiffness and adhesivity, as independently tunable parameters that govern marrow-derived stem cell motility. We adopted an “inverse opal” processing technique to create synthetic scaffolds by crosslinking poly(ethylene glycol) at different densities (controlling matrix elastic moduli or stiffness) and small doses of a heterobifunctional monomer (controlling matrix adhesivity) around templating beads of different radii. As pore diameter was varied from 7 to 17 µm (i.e., from significantly smaller than the spherical cell diameter to approximately cell diameter), it displayed a profound effect on migration of these stem cells—including the degree to which motility was sensitive to changes in matrix stiffness and adhesivity. Surprisingly, the highest probability for substantive cell movement through pores was observed for an intermediate pore diameter, rather than the largest pore diameter, which exceeded cell diameter. The relationships between migration speed, displacement, and total path length were found to depend strongly on pore diameter. We attribute this dependence to convolution of pore diameter and void chamber diameter, yielding different geometric environments experienced by the cells within. Bioeng. 2011; 108:1181–1193en_US
dc.description.sponsorship(National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U.S.) (NRSA Fellowship GM083472)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U.S.) Cell Migration Consortium Grant GM064346)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (CAREER CBET-0644846)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.23027en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleMarrow-Derived Stem Cell Motility in 3D Synthetic Scaffold Is Governed by Geometry Along With Adhesivity and Stiffnessen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPeyton, Shelly R. et al. “Marrow-Derived Stem Cell Motility in 3D Synthetic Scaffold Is Governed by Geometry Along with Adhesivity and Stiffness.” Biotechnology and Bioengineering 108.5 (2011): 1181–1193.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Gynepathology Researchen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Materials Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPeyton, Shelly R.
dc.contributor.mitauthorKalcioglu, Zeynep Ilke
dc.contributor.mitauthorCohen, Joshua C.
dc.contributor.mitauthorRunkle, Anne P.
dc.contributor.mitauthorVan Vliet, Krystyn J.
dc.contributor.mitauthorLauffenburger, Douglas A.
dc.contributor.mitauthorGriffith, Linda G.
dc.relation.journalBiotechnology and Bioengineeringen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsPeyton, Shelly R.; Kalcioglu, Z. Ilke; Cohen, Joshua C.; Runkle, Anne P.; Van Vliet, Krystyn J.; Lauffenburger, Douglas A.; Griffith, Linda G.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5735-0560
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1801-5548
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record