Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKaplan, David L.
dc.contributor.authorEsposito, P.
dc.contributor.authorChatterjee, S.
dc.contributor.authorPossenti, A.
dc.contributor.authorMcLaughlin, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorCamilo, F.
dc.contributor.authorChakrabarty, Deepto
dc.contributor.authorSlane, P. O.
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-17T19:20:09Z
dc.date.available2013-01-17T19:20:09Z
dc.date.issued2009-11
dc.date.submitted2009-08
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.issn1365-8711
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/76289
dc.descriptionAuthor manuscript 27 Aug 2009en_US
dc.description.abstractX-ray emission from the enigmatic rotating radio transients (RRATs) offers a vital clue to understanding these objects and how they relate to the greater neutron star population. An X-ray counterpart to RRAT J1819−1458 is known, and its properties are similar to those of other middle-aged (0.1 Myr) neutron stars. We have searched for X-ray emission with Chandra/Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer at the positions of two RRATs with arcsecond (or better) localization, J0847−4316 and J1846−0257. Despite deep searches (especially for RRAT J1846−0257) we did not detect any emission with 0.3–8 keV count-rate limits of 1 and 0.068 counts ks[superscript −1], respectively, at 3σ confidence. Assuming thermal emission similar to that seen from RRAT J1819−1458 (a blackbody with radius ≈20 km), we derive effective temperature limits of 77 and 91 eV for the nominal values of the distances and column densities to both sources, although both of those quantities are highly uncertain and correlated. If we instead fix the temperature of the emission (a blackbody with kT= 0.14 keV), we derive unabsorbed luminosity limits in the 0.3–8 keV range of 1 × 10[superscript 32] and 3 × 1032 erg s[superscript −1]. These limits are considerably below the luminosity of RRAT J1819−1458(4 × 10[superscript 33] erg s[superscript −1]), suggesting that RRATs J0847−4316 and J1846−0257 have cooled beyond the point of visibility (plausible given the differences in characteristic age). However, as we have not detected X-ray emission, it may also be that the emission from RRATs J0847−4316 and J1846−0257 has a different character from that of RRAT J1819−1458. The two non-detections may prove a counterpoint to RRAT J1819−1458, but more detections are certainly needed before we can begin to derive general X-ray emission properties for the RRAT populations.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipChandra X-ray Observatory (U.S.) (Grant GOO7-8064X)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwellen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15541.xen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourcearXiven_US
dc.titleUpper limits on X-ray emission from two rotating radio transientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationKaplan, D. L. et al. “Upper Limits on X-ray Emission from Two Rotating Radio Transients.” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 400.3 (2009): 1445–1450.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physicsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Researchen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorChakrabarty, Deepto
dc.relation.journalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsKaplan, D. L.; Esposito, P.; Chatterjee, S.; Possenti, A.; McLaughlin, M. A.; Camilo, F.; Chakrabarty, D.; Slane, P. O.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8804-8946
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record