Saints, heroes, sages, and villains
Author(s)
Markovits, Julia
DownloadSaints Heroes Phil Studies Final Version.pdf (264.6Kb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This essay explores the question of how to be good. My starting point is
a thesis about moral worth that I’ve defended in the past: roughly, that an action is
morally worthy if and only it is performed for the reasons why it is right. While I
think that account gets at one important sense of moral goodness, I argue here that it
fails to capture several ways of being worthy of admiration on moral grounds. Moral
goodness is more multi-faceted. My title is intended to capture that multi-facetedness:
the essay examines saintliness, heroism, and sagacity. The variety of our
common-sense moral ideals underscores the inadequacy of any one account of
moral admirableness, and I hope to illuminate the distinct roles these ideals play in
our everyday understanding of goodness. Along the way, I give an account of what
makes actions heroic, of whether such actions are supererogatory, and of what, if
anything, is wrong with moral deference. At the close of the essay, I begin to
explore the flipside of these ideals: villainy.
Date issued
2012-03Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and PhilosophyJournal
Philosophical Studies
Publisher
Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Citation
Markovits, Julia. “Saints, Heroes, Sages, and Villains.” Philosophical Studies 158.2 (2012): 289–311. Web.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0031-8116
1573-0883