Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Thomas J.
dc.contributor.authorLo, Andrew W.
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-27T15:22:04Z
dc.date.available2013-02-27T15:22:04Z
dc.date.issued2012-11
dc.date.submitted2012-07
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/77205
dc.description.abstractBackground: Most economic theories are based on the premise that individuals maximize their own self-interest and correctly incorporate the structure of their environment into all decisions, thanks to human intelligence. The influence of this paradigm goes far beyond academia–it underlies current macroeconomic and monetary policies, and is also an integral part of existing financial regulations. However, there is mounting empirical and experimental evidence, including the recent financial crisis, suggesting that humans do not always behave rationally, but often make seemingly random and suboptimal decisions. Methods and Findings: Here we propose to reconcile these contradictory perspectives by developing a simple binary-choice model that takes evolutionary consequences of decisions into account as well as the role of intelligence, which we define as any ability of an individual to increase its genetic success. If no intelligence is present, our model produces results consistent with prior literature and shows that risks that are independent across individuals in a generation generally lead to risk-neutral behaviors, but that risks that are correlated across a generation can lead to behaviors such as risk aversion, loss aversion, probability matching, and randomization. When intelligence is present the nature of risk also matters, and we show that even when risks are independent, either risk-neutral behavior or probability matching will occur depending upon the cost of intelligence in terms of reproductive success. In the case of correlated risks, we derive an implicit formula that shows how intelligence can emerge via selection, why it may be bounded, and how such bounds typically imply the coexistence of multiple levels and types of intelligence as a reflection of varying environmental conditions. Conclusions: Rational economic behavior in which individuals maximize their own self interest is only one of many possible types of behavior that arise from natural selection. The key to understanding which types of behavior are more likely to survive is how behavior affects reproductive success in a given population’s environment. From this perspective, intelligence is naturally defined as behavior that increases the probability of reproductive success, and bounds on rationality are determined by physiological and environmental constraints.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Laboratory for Financial Engineeringen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050310en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/en_US
dc.sourcePLoSen_US
dc.titleAn Evolutionary Model of Bounded Rationality and Intelligenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBrennan, Thomas J., and Andrew W. Lo. “An Evolutionary Model of Bounded Rationality and Intelligence.” Ed. Eshel Ben-Jacob. PLoS ONE 7.11 (2012).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLo, Andrew W.
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONEen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsBrennan, Thomas J.; Lo, Andrew W.en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2944-7773
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record