An intriguing empirical rule for computing the first normal stress difference from steady shear viscosity data for concentrated polymer solutions and melts
Author(s)
Sharma, Vivek; McKinley, Gareth H
DownloadMcKinley_An intriguing.pdf (1.175Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The Cox–Merz rule and Laun’s rule are two empirical relations that allow the estimation of steady shear viscosity and first normal stress difference, respectively, using small amplitude oscillatory shear measurements. The validity of the Cox–Merz rule and Laun’s rule imply an agreement between the linear viscoelastic response measured in small amplitude oscillatory shear and the nonlinear response measured in steady shear flow measurements. We show that by using a lesser-known relationship also proposed by Cox and Merz, in conjunction with Laun’s rule, a relationship between the rate-dependent steady shear viscosity and the first normal stress difference can be deduced. The new empirical relation enables a priori estimation of the first normal stress difference using only the steady flow curve (i.e., viscosity vs shear rate data). Comparison of the estimated first normal stress difference with the measured values for six different polymer solutions and melts show that the empirical rule provides values that are in reasonable agreement with measurements over a wide range of shear rates, thus deepening the intriguing connection between linear and nonlinear viscoelastic response of entangled polymeric materials.
Date issued
2012-01Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Hatsopoulos Microfluids LaboratoryJournal
Rheologica Acta
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Citation
Sharma, Vivek, and Gareth H. McKinley. An Intriguing Empirical Rule for Computing the First Normal Stress Difference from Steady Shear Viscosity Data for Concentrated Polymer Solutions and Melts. Rheologica Acta 51, no. 6 (June 22, 2012): 487-495.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
0035-4511
1435-1528