Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoss, Adam Michael
dc.contributor.authorMcManus, Hugh L.
dc.contributor.authorRhodes, Donna H.
dc.contributor.authorHastings, Daniel E.
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-04T17:50:12Z
dc.date.available2013-11-04T17:50:12Z
dc.date.issued2010-08
dc.identifier.isbn978-1-60086-966-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/81979
dc.description.abstractThe significant time, effort, and resource expenditures needed to design and develop aerospace systems motivate on-going research into developing methods for generating, evaluating, and selecting candidate system solutions that can deliver more benefit for a given cost. Compounding the problem is the multiplicity of perspectives of the many stakeholders for such systems, altering the meaning of “benefit” and “cost” depending on the stakeholder considered. Tradespace exploration techniques have been used in the past to generate large datasets in order to gain insights into design-value, cost-benefit tradeoffs for complex aerospace systems. Using interactive tradespace exploration to support multi-stakeholder negotiations can reveal these tradeoffs not only for individuals, but also across a group. A method is introduced and applied to two aerospace cases in order to explore the potential for interactive tradespace exploration to support stakeholder negotiations. Preliminary results indicate the method to be a rapid and beneficial technique, which generated compromise alternatives, guided the elicitation of previously unarticulated information, and resulted in increased confidence and solution buy-in of participating stakeholders.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Systems Engineering Advancement Research Initiativeen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronauticsen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-8664en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleRole for Interactive Tradespace Exploration in Multi-Stakeholder Negotiationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationRoss, Adam, Hugh McManus, Donna Rhodes, and Daniel Hastings. “Role for Interactive Tradespace Exploration in Multi- Stakeholder Negotiations.” In AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMIT Sociotechnical Systems Research Centeren_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRoss, Adam Michaelen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMcManus, Hugh L.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorRhodes, Donna H.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHastings, Daniel E.en_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Expositionen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsRoss, Adam; McManus, Hugh; Rhodes, Donna; Hastings, Danielen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4421-5110
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record