Comparison of Fixed and Variable Pitch Actuators for Agile Quadrotors
Author(s)
Cutler, Mark Johnson; Ure, Nazim Kemal; Michini, Bernard J.; How, Jonathan P.
DownloadHow_Comparison of fixed.pdf (3.714Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper presents the design, analysis and experimental testing of a variable-
pitch quadrotor. A custom in-lab built quadrotor with on-board attitude stabi-
lization is developed and tested. An analysis of the dynamic di erences in thrust
output between a xed-pitch and variable-pitch propeller is given and validated
with simulation and experimental results. It is shown that variable-pitch actuation
has signi cant advantages over the conventional xed-pitch con guration, includ-
ing increased thrust rate of change, decreased control saturation, and the ability to quickly and e ciently reverse thrust. These advantages result in improved quadro-tor tracking of linear and angular acceleration command inputs in both simulation and hardware testing. The bene ts should enable more aggressive and aerobatic ying with the variable-pitch quadrotor than with standard xed-pitch actuation, while retaining much of the mechanical simplicity and robustness of the xed-pitch quadrotor.
Date issued
2011-08Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Aerospace Controls Laboratory; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and AstronauticsJournal
Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference
Publisher
American Institute of Aeromautics and Astronautics
Citation
Mark Cutler, Nazim-Kemal Ure, Bernard Michini, and Jonathan How. "Comparison of Fixed and Variable Pitch Actuators for Agile Quadrotors" AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference (August 2011)
Version: Author's final manuscript