Fairness and Redistribution: Reply
DownloadAngeletos_Fairness and redistribution.pdf (512Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper responds to the comment of Di Tella and Dubra (2013). We first clarify that the model of Alesina and Angeletos (2005) admits two distinct types of multiplicity: one that is at the core of their contribution, and a separate one that is at work in Di Tella and Dubra's example. We then proceed to show how Alesina and Angeletos's results are robust to alternative specifications of the voting mechanism.
Date issued
2013-02Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of EconomicsJournal
American Economic Review
Publisher
American Economic Association
Citation
Alesina, Alberto, George-Marios Angeletos, and Guido Cozzi. “Fairness and Redistribution: Reply.” American Economic Review 103, no. 1 (February 2013): 554-561.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
0002-8282
1944-7981