Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaicker, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorTaubman, Sarah L.
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Heidi L.
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, Mira
dc.contributor.authorGruber, Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorNewhouse, Joseph P.
dc.contributor.authorSchneider, Eric C.
dc.contributor.authorWright, Bill J.
dc.contributor.authorZaslavsky, Alan M.
dc.contributor.authorFinkelstein, Amy
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-05T20:19:15Z
dc.date.available2013-12-05T20:19:15Z
dc.date.issued2013-05
dc.identifier.issn0028-4793
dc.identifier.issn1533-4406
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/82640
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite the imminent expansion of Medicaid coverage for low-income adults, the effects of expanding coverage are unclear. The 2008 Medicaid expansion in Oregon based on lottery drawings from a waiting list provided an opportunity to evaluate these effects. Methods: Approximately 2 years after the lottery, we obtained data from 6387 adults who were randomly selected to be able to apply for Medicaid coverage and 5842 adults who were not selected. Measures included blood-pressure, cholesterol, and glycated hemoglobin levels; screening for depression; medication inventories; and self-reported diagnoses, health status, health care utilization, and out-of-pocket spending for such services. We used the random assignment in the lottery to calculate the effect of Medicaid coverage. Results: We found no significant effect of Medicaid coverage on the prevalence or diagnosis of hypertension or high cholesterol levels or on the use of medication for these conditions. Medicaid coverage significantly increased the probability of a diagnosis of diabetes and the use of diabetes medication, but we observed no significant effect on average glycated hemoglobin levels or on the percentage of participants with levels of 6.5% or higher. Medicaid coverage decreased the probability of a positive screening for depression (−9.15 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, −16.70 to −1.60; P=0.02), increased the use of many preventive services, and nearly eliminated catastrophic out-of-pocket medical expenditures. Conclusions: This randomized, controlled study showed that Medicaid coverage generated no significant improvements in measured physical health outcomes in the first 2 years, but it did increase use of health care services, raise rates of diabetes detection and management, lower rates of depression, and reduce financial strain.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCalifornia HealthCare Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute on Aging (P30AG012810)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute on Aging (RC2AGO36631)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute on Aging (R01AG0345151)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipRobert Wood Johnson Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAlfred P. Sloan Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSmith Richardson Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Social Security Administration (5 RRC 08098400-03-00, to the National Bureau of Economic Research as part of the Retirement Research Consortium of the Social Security Administration)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (U.S.)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNew England Journal of Medicineen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1212321en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleThe Oregon Experiment — Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBaicker, Katherine, Sarah L. Taubman, Heidi L. Allen, Mira Bernstein, Jonathan H. Gruber, Joseph P. Newhouse, Eric C. Schneider, Bill J. Wright, Alan M. Zaslavsky, and Amy N. Finkelstein. “The Oregon Experiment — Effects of Medicaid on Clinical Outcomes.” New England Journal of Medicine 368, no. 18 (May 2, 2013): 1713-1722.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorGruber, Jonathanen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFinkelstein, Amyen_US
dc.relation.journalNew England Journal of Medicineen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsBaicker, Katherine; Taubman, Sarah L.; Allen, Heidi L.; Bernstein, Mira; Gruber, Jonathan H.; Newhouse, Joseph P.; Schneider, Eric C.; Wright, Bill J.; Zaslavsky, Alan M.; Finkelstein, Amy N.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9877-3065
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9941-6684
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record