Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJones, Russell
dc.contributor.authorTravers, Constance
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, Charles
dc.contributor.authorLazar, Brian
dc.contributor.authorEnglish, Eric
dc.contributor.authorLipton, Joshua
dc.contributor.authorVogel, Jason
dc.contributor.authorMartinich, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorStrzepek, Kenneth Marc
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-03T14:18:38Z
dc.date.available2014-02-03T14:18:38Z
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.date.submitted2012-01
dc.identifier.issn1381-2386
dc.identifier.issn1573-1596
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84639
dc.description.abstractWe estimated the biological and economic impacts of climate change on freshwater fisheries in the United States (U.S.). Changes in stream temperatures, flows, and the spatial extent of suitable thermal habitats for fish guilds were modeled for the coterminous U.S. using a range of projected changes in temperature and precipitation caused by increased greenhouse gases (GHGs). Based on modeled shifts in available thermal habitat for fish guilds, we estimated potential economic impacts associated with changes in freshwater recreational fishing using a national-scale economic model of recreational fishing behavior. In general, the spatial distribution of coldwater fisheries is projected to contract, being replaced by warm/cool water and high-thermally tolerant, lower recreational priority (i.e., “rough”) fisheries. Changes in thermal habitat suitability become more pronounced under higher emissions scenarios and at later time periods. Under the highest GHG emissions scenario, by year 2100 habitat for coldwater fisheries is projected to decline by roughly 50 % and be largely confined to mountainous areas in the western U.S. and very limited areas of New England and the Appalachians. The economic model projects a decline in coldwater fishing days ranging from 1.25 million in 2030 to 6.42 million by 2100 and that the total present value of national economic losses to freshwater recreational fishing from 2009 to 2100 could range from 81 million to 6.4 billion, depending on the emissions scenario and the choice of discount rate.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-012-9385-3en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringeren_US
dc.titleClimate change impacts on freshwater recreational fishing in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationJones, Russell, Constance Travers, Charles Rodgers, Brian Lazar, Eric English, Joshua Lipton, Jason Vogel, Kenneth Strzepek, and Jeremy Martinich. “Climate change impacts on freshwater recreational fishing in the United States.” Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 18, no. 6 (August 10, 2013): 731-758.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Joint Program on the Science & Policy of Global Changeen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorStrzepek, Kenneth Marcen_US
dc.relation.journalMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Changeen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsJones, Russell; Travers, Constance; Rodgers, Charles; Lazar, Brian; English, Eric; Lipton, Joshua; Vogel, Jason; Strzepek, Kenneth; Martinich, Jeremyen_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record