Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSher, Noa
dc.contributor.authorVon Stetina, Jessica R.
dc.contributor.authorBell, George W.
dc.contributor.authorMatsuura, Shinobu
dc.contributor.authorRavid, Katya
dc.contributor.authorOrr-Weaver, Terry
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-14T14:57:47Z
dc.date.available2014-02-14T14:57:47Z
dc.date.issued2013-04
dc.date.submitted2012-12
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.issn1091-6490
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84944
dc.description.abstractThroughout the plant and animal kingdoms specific cell types become polyploid, increasing their DNA content to attain a large cell size. In mammals, megakaryocytes (MKs) become polyploid before fragmenting into platelets. The mammalian trophoblast giant cells (TGCs) exploit their size to form a barrier between the maternal and embryonic tissues. The mechanism of polyploidization has been investigated extensively in Drosophila, in which a modified cell cycle—the endocycle, consisting solely of alternating S and gap phases—produces polyploid tissues. During S phase in the Drosophila endocycle, heterochromatin and specific euchromatic regions are underreplicated and reduced in copy number. Here we investigate the properties of polyploidization in murine MKs and TGCs. We induced differentiation of primary MKs and directly microdissected TGCs from embryonic day 9.5 implantation sites. The copy number across the genome was analyzed by array-based comparative genome hybridization. In striking contrast to Drosophila, the genome was uniformly and integrally duplicated in both MKs and TGCs. This was true even for heterochromatic regions analyzed by quantitative PCR. Underreplication of specific regions in polyploid cells is proposed to be due to a slower S phase, resulting from low expression of S-phase genes, causing failure to duplicate late replicating genomic intervals. We defined the transcriptome of TGCs and found robust expression of S-phase genes. Similarly, S-phase gene expression is not repressed in MKs, providing an explanation for the distinct endoreplication parameters compared with Drosophila. Consistent with TGCs endocycling rather than undergoing endomitosis, they have low expression of M-phase genes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipG. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmerican Cancer Society (Research Professor Grant)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences (U.S.)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304889110en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourcePNASen_US
dc.titleFundamental differences in endoreplication in mammals and Drosophila revealed by analysis of endocycling and endomitotic cellsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationSher, N., J. R. Von Stetina, G. W. Bell, S. Matsuura, K. Ravid, and T. L. Orr-Weaver. “Fundamental differences in endoreplication in mammals and Drosophila revealed by analysis of endocycling and endomitotic cells.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, no. 23 (June 4, 2013): 9368-9373.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Researchen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorOrr-Weaver, Terry L.en_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsSher, N.; Von Stetina, J. R.; Bell, G. W.; Matsuura, S.; Ravid, K.; Orr-Weaver, T. L.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7934-111X
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record