Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPasserini, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorKazimi, Mujid S
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-30T12:51:31Z
dc.date.available2014-06-30T12:51:31Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.date.submitted2012-08
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88115
dc.description.abstractThe nuclear fuel cycle is the series of stages that nuclear fuel materials go through in a cradle to grave framework. The Once Through Cycle (OTC) is the current fuel cycle implemented in the United States; in which an appropriate form of the fuel is irradiated through a nuclear reactor only once before it is disposed of as waste. The discharged fuel contains materials that can be suitable for use as fuel. Thus, different types of fuel recycling technologies may be introduced in order to more fully utilize the energy potential of the fuel, or reduce the environmental impacts and proliferation concerns about the discarded fuel materials. Nuclear fuel cycle systems analysis is applied in this paper to attain a better understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of fuel cycle alternatives. Through the use of the nuclear fuel cycle analysis code CAFCA (Code for Advanced Fuel Cycle Analysis), the impact of a number of recycling technologies and the associated fuel cycle options is explored in the context of the U.S. energy scenario over 100 years. Particular focus is given to the quantification of Uranium utilization, the amount of Transuranic Material (TRU) generated and the economics of the different options compared to the base-line case, the OTC option. It is concluded that LWRs and the OTC are likely to dominate the nuclear energy supply system for the period considered due to limitations on availability of TRU to initiate recycling technologies. While the introduction of U-235 initiated fast reactors can accelerate their penetration of the nuclear energy system, their higher capital cost may lead to continued preference for the LWR-OTC cycle.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipElectric Power Research Instituteen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipIdaho National Laboratoryen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNuclear Energy Instituteen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su4102377en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceMDPI Publishingen_US
dc.titleSustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Optionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPasserini, Stefano, and Mujid Kazimi. “Sustainability Features of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Options.” Sustainability 4, no. 12 (September 27, 2012): 2377–2398.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPasserini, Stefanoen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorKazimi, Mujid S.en_US
dc.relation.journalSustainabilityen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsPasserini, Stefano; Kazimi, Mujiden_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record