Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShrivastav, Nidhi
dc.contributor.authorLi, Deyu
dc.contributor.authorDelaney, James C.
dc.contributor.authorFrick, Lauren E.
dc.contributor.authorFoti, James J.
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Graham C.
dc.contributor.authorEssigmann, John M.
dc.contributor.authorFedeles, Bogdan I
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-08T16:35:46Z
dc.date.available2014-07-08T16:35:46Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.date.submitted2014-02
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88192
dc.description.abstractDinB, the E. coli translesion synthesis polymerase, has been shown to bypass several N[superscript 2]-alkylguanine adducts in vitro, including N[superscript 2]-furfurylguanine, the structural analog of the DNA adduct formed by the antibacterial agent nitrofurazone. Recently, it was demonstrated that the Fe(II)- and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase AlkB, a DNA repair enzyme, can dealkylate in vitro a series of N[superscript 2]-alkyguanines, including N[superscript 2]-furfurylguanine. The present study explored, head to head, the in vivo relative contributions of these two DNA maintenance pathways (replicative bypass vs. repair) as they processed a series of structurally varied, biologically relevant N[superscript 2]-alkylguanine lesions: N[superscript 2]-furfurylguanine (FF), 2-tetrahydrofuran-2-yl-methylguanine (HF), 2-methylguanine, and 2-ethylguanine. Each lesion was chemically synthesized and incorporated site-specifically into an M13 bacteriophage genome, which was then replicated in E. coli cells deficient or proficient for DinB and AlkB (4 strains in total). Biochemical tools were employed to analyze the relative replication efficiencies of the phage (a measure of the bypass efficiency of each lesion) and the base composition at the lesion site after replication (a measure of the mutagenesis profile of each lesion). The main findings were: 1) Among the lesions studied, the bulky FF and HF lesions proved to be strong replication blocks when introduced site-specifically on a single-stranded vector in DinB deficient cells. This toxic effect disappeared in the strains expressing physiological levels of DinB. 2) AlkB is known to repair N[superscript 2]-alkylguanine lesions in vitro; however, the presence of AlkB showed no relief from the replication blocks induced by FF and HF in vivo. 3) The mutagenic properties of the entire series of N[superscript 2]-alkyguanines adducts were investigated in vivo for the first time. None of the adducts were mutagenic under the conditions evaluated, regardless of the DinB or AlkB cellular status. Taken together, the data indicated that the cellular pathway to combat bulky N[superscript 2]-alkylguanine DNA adducts was DinB-dependent lesion bypass.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant CA080024)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant CA26731)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant ES002109)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant CA021615)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094716en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.titleA Chemical Genetics Analysis of the Roles of Bypass Polymerase DinB and DNA Repair Protein AlkB in Processing N[superscript 2]-Alkylguanine Lesions In Vivoen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationShrivastav, Nidhi, Bogdan I. Fedeles, Deyu Li, James C. Delaney, Lauren E. Frick, James J. Foti, Graham C. Walker, and John M. Essigmann. “A Chemical Genetics Analysis of the Roles of Bypass Polymerase DinB and DNA Repair Protein AlkB in Processing N2-Alkylguanine Lesions In Vivo.” Edited by Martin G. Marinus. PLoS ONE 9, no. 4 (April 14, 2014): e94716.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Environmental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemistryen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorShrivastav, Nidhien_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFedeles, Bogdan I.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLi, Deyuen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorDelaney, James C.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFrick, Lauren E.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorEssigmann, John M.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorFoti, James J.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorWalker, Graham C.en_US
dc.relation.journalPLoS ONEen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsShrivastav, Nidhi; Fedeles, Bogdan I.; Li, Deyu; Delaney, James C.; Frick, Lauren E.; Foti, James J.; Walker, Graham C.; Essigmann, John M.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6159-0778
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-8261
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2196-5691
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record