Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBorondo, J.
dc.contributor.authorBorondo, F.
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-Sickert, C.
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo Ramaciotti, Cesar A.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-08T19:46:12Z
dc.date.available2014-07-08T19:46:12Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.date.submitted2013-11
dc.identifier.issn2045-2322
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88213
dc.description.abstractA system is said to be meritocratic if the compensation and power available to individuals is determined by their abilities and merits. A system is topocratic if the compensation and power available to an individual is determined primarily by her position in a network. Here we introduce a model that is perfectly meritocratic for fully connected networks but that becomes topocratic for sparse networks-like the ones in society. In the model, individuals produce and sell content, but also distribute the content produced by others when they belong to the shortest path connecting a buyer and a seller. The production and distribution of content defines two channels of compensation: a meritocratic channel, where individuals are compensated for the content they produce, and a topocratic channel, where individual compensation is based on the number of shortest paths that go through them in the network. We solve the model analytically and show that the distribution of payoffs is meritocratic only if the average degree of the nodes is larger than a root of the total number of nodes. We conclude that, in the light of this model, the sparsity and structure of networks represents a fundamental constraint to the meritocracy of societies.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMIT Media Lab Consortiumen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep03784en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0en_US
dc.sourceNature Publishing Groupen_US
dc.titleTo Each According to its Degree: The Meritocracy and Topocracy of Embedded Marketsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBorondo, J., F. Borondo, C. Rodriguez-Sickert, and C. A. Hidalgo. “To Each According to Its Degree: The Meritocracy and Topocracy of Embedded Markets.” Sci. Rep. 4 (January 21, 2014).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Media Arts and Sciences (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHidalgo, Cesar A.en_US
dc.relation.journalScientific Reportsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsBorondo, J.; Borondo, F.; Rodriguez-Sickert, C.; Hidalgo, C. A.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6031-5982
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record