Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAnthony, Brian
dc.contributor.authorHardt, David E.
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-11T17:30:29Z
dc.date.available2014-07-11T17:30:29Z
dc.date.issued2012-06
dc.identifier.otherAC 2012-3749
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/88281
dc.description.abstractWe find that a conventional engineering degree approach to education is not sufficient to meet the new challenges in the ecosystem of manufacturing, design and business innovation, and product realization. Instead a new form of engineering education, the “Professional Masters” is required that takes the grounding provided by typical Bachelor of Science in engineering degree and provides condensed, formalized, experiencewith systems,applications, projects, and non-technical topics to create a true professional ready to maximize their value to the company and ready to use their experience to lead. The Master of Engineering in Manufacturing (MEngM) at MIT was developed over a period of 10 years, and has more than 200 alumni. It is based on the notion of a need for graduate level education in the profession of engineering that is not fulfilled by the conventional research- oriented Master of Science degree. We have learned that there is a large pool of outstanding students who will seek out this degree once it is offered, and who have as alumni drawn strongly positive reviews from their employers. Students in the program are drawn to the notion that manufacturing is how technological advances and innovations become rooted in a nation's economy. They want to understand the essential components and growth opportunities of the foundation - manufacturing and innovation - of an economy. There are many indicators of the decline of manufacturing in the US, most of them economic. One troubling indicator is the persistent lack of interest in careers in this field, particularly at the collegiate and post-graduate level. While there are continual calls for better labor force training and government programs to support the same, there are actually disincentives for promising young professionals to enter this field. Societal perception and industry needs seem to run counter to one another. We propose that the MEngM can serve as one example of a new national model for professional manufacturing engineering education. It can profoundly impact the US’s innovation ecosystem which is the foundation of our manufacturing based economy today and in the future.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Engineering Educationen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://www.asee.org/public/conferences/8/papers/3749/viewen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceProf. Hardt via Angie Locknaren_US
dc.titleRevitalizing us manufacturing to capitalize on innovation - through educationen_US
dc.title.alternativeRevitalizing us manufacturing to capitalize on innovationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationAnthony, Brian W. and David E. Hardt. "Revitalizing us manufacturing to capitalize on innovation - through education." 2012 ASEE annual conference & exposition, June 10-13, 2012, San Antonio Convention Center, San Antonio, TX.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.approverHardt, David E.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHardt, David E.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorAnthony, Brianen_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the 119th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012en_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsAnthony, Brian W.; Hardt, David E.en_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record