Anatomical connectivity patterns predict face selectivity in the fusiform gyrus
Author(s)
Koldewyn, Kami; Reynolds, Gretchen; Saygin, Zeynep M.; Osher, David E.; Gabrieli, John D. E.; Saxe, Rebecca R.; ... Show more Show less
DownloadGabrieli_Anatomical connectivity.pdf (2.755Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
A fundamental assumption in neuroscience is that brain structure determines function. Accordingly, functionally distinct regions of cortex should be structurally distinct in their connections to other areas. We tested this hypothesis in relation to face selectivity in the fusiform gyrus. By using only structural connectivity, as measured through diffusion-weighted imaging, we were able to predict functional activation to faces in the fusiform gyrus. These predictions outperformed two control models and a standard group-average benchmark. The structure–function relationship discovered from the initial participants was highly robust in predicting activation in a second group of participants, despite differences in acquisition parameters and stimuli. This approach can thus reliably estimate activation in participants who cannot perform functional imaging tasks and is an alternative to group-activation maps. Additionally, we identified cortical regions whose connectivity was highly influential in predicting face selectivity within the fusiform, suggesting a possible mechanistic architecture underlying face processing in humans.
Date issued
2011-12Department
Harvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology; Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences; McGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITJournal
Nature Neuroscience
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
Citation
Saygin, Zeynep M, David E Osher, Kami Koldewyn, Gretchen Reynolds, John D E Gabrieli, and Rebecca R Saxe. “Anatomical Connectivity Patterns Predict Face Selectivity in the Fusiform Gyrus.” Nat Neurosci 15, no. 2 (December 25, 2011): 321–327.
Version: Author's final manuscript
ISSN
1097-6256
1546-1726