Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhao, Lei
dc.contributor.authorWhiteaker, Jeffrey R.
dc.contributor.authorPope, Matthew E.
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Eric
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Angela
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, N. Leigh
dc.contributor.authorPearson, Terry W.
dc.contributor.authorPaulovich, Amanda G.
dc.contributor.authorCarr, Steven A
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-16T19:58:33Z
dc.date.available2014-09-16T19:58:33Z
dc.date.issued2011-07
dc.identifier.issn1940-087X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/89657
dc.description.abstractThere is a great need for quantitative assays in measuring proteins. Traditional sandwich immunoassays, largely considered the gold standard in quantitation, are associated with a high cost, long lead time, and are fraught with drawbacks (e.g. heterophilic antibodies, autoantibody interference, 'hook-effect').1 An alternative technique is affinity enrichment of peptides coupled with quantitative mass spectrometry, commonly referred to as SISCAPA (Stable Isotope Standards and Capture by Anti-Peptide Antibodies).2 In this technique, affinity enrichment of peptides with stable isotope dilution and detection by selected/multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (SRM/MRM-MS) provides quantitative measurement of peptides as surrogates for their respective proteins. SRM/MRM-MS is well established for accurate quantitation of small molecules 3, 4 and more recently has been adapted to measure the concentrations of proteins in plasma and cell lysates.5-7 To achieve quantitation of proteins, these larger molecules are digested to component peptides using an enzyme such as trypsin One or more selected peptides whose sequence is unique to the target protein in that species (i.e. "proteotypic" peptides) are then enriched from the sample using anti-peptide antibodies and measured as quantitative stoichiometric surrogates for protein concentration in the sample. Hence, coupled to stable isotope dilution (SID) methods (i.e. a spiked-in stable isotope labeled peptide standard), SRM/MRM can be used to measure concentrations of proteotypic peptides as surrogates for quantification of proteins in complex biological matrices. The assays have several advantages compared to traditional immunoassays. The reagents are relatively less expensive to generate, the specificity for the analyte is excellent, the assays can be highly multiplexed, enrichment can be performed from neat plasma (no depletion required), and the technique is amenable to a wide array of proteins or modifications of interest.8-13 In this video we demonstrate the basic protocol as adapted to a magnetic bead platform.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Cancer Institute (U.S.) (NCI Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment Center (CPTAC) grant (#U24 CA126476))en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEntertainment Industry Foundation (grant)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEntertainment Industry Foundation (EFI Women's Cancer Research Fund to the Breast Cancer Biomarker Discovery Consortium)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipW. M. Keck Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCanary Foundationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPaul G. Allen Family Foundationen_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMyJoVE Corporationen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3791/2812en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/en_US
dc.sourceMyJoVE Corporationen_US
dc.titleQuantification of Proteins Using Peptide Immunoaffinity Enrichment Coupled with Mass Spectrometryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationZhao, Lei, Jeffrey R. Whiteaker, Matthew E. Pope, Eric Kuhn, Angela Jackson, N. Leigh Anderson, Terry W. Pearson, Steven A. Carr, and Amanda G. Paulovich. “Quantification of Proteins Using Peptide Immunoaffinity Enrichment Coupled with Mass Spectrometry.” JoVE no. 53 (2011).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentKoch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at MITen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorCarr, Steven A.en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Visualized Experimentsen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsZhao, Lei; Whiteaker, Jeffrey R.; Pope, Matthew E.; Kuhn, Eric; Jackson, Angela; Anderson, N. Leigh; Pearson, Terry W.; Carr, Steven A.; Paulovich, Amanda G.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7203-4299
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record