MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • MIT Open Access Articles
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Ecosystem fluxes of hydrogen: a comparison of flux-gradient methods

Author(s)
Meredith, Laura Kelsey; Commane, R.; Munger, J. W.; Dunn, A.; Tang, J.; Wofsy, S. C.; Prinn, Ronald G.; ... Show more Show less
Thumbnail
DownloadMeredith-2014-Ecosystem fluxes of.pdf (1.769Mb)
PUBLISHER_CC

Publisher with Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution

Terms of use
Creative Commons Attribution http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Our understanding of biosphere–atmosphere exchange has been considerably enhanced by eddy covariance measurements. However, there remain many trace gases, such as molecular hydrogen (H[subscript 2]), that lack suitable analytical methods to measure their fluxes by eddy covariance. In such cases, flux-gradient methods can be used to calculate ecosystem-scale fluxes from vertical concentration gradients. The budget of atmospheric H[subscript 2] is poorly constrained by the limited available observations, and thus the ability to quantify and characterize the sources and sinks of H[subscript 2] by flux-gradient methods in various ecosystems is important. We developed an approach to make nonintrusive, automated measurements of ecosystem-scale H2 fluxes both above and below the forest canopy at the Harvard Forest in Petersham, Massachusetts, for over a year. We used three flux-gradient methods to calculate the fluxes: two similarity methods that do not rely on a micrometeorological determination of the eddy diffusivity, K, based on (1) trace gases or (2) sensible heat, and one flux-gradient method that (3) parameterizes K. We quantitatively assessed the flux-gradient methods using CO[subscript 2] and H[subscript 2]O by comparison to their simultaneous independent flux measurements via eddy covariance and soil chambers. All three flux-gradient methods performed well in certain locations, seasons, and times of day, and the best methods were trace gas similarity for above the canopy and K parameterization below it. Sensible heat similarity required several independent measurements, and the results were more variable, in part because those data were only available in the winter, when heat fluxes and temperature gradients were small and difficult to measure. Biases were often observed between flux-gradient methods and the independent flux measurements, and there was at least a 26% difference in nocturnal eddy-derived net ecosystem exchange (NEE) and chamber measurements. H[subscript 2] fluxes calculated in a summer period agreed within their uncertainty and pointed to soil uptake as the main driver of H[subscript 2] exchange at Harvard Forest, with H[subscript 2] deposition velocities ranging from 0.04 to 0.10 cm s[superscript −1].
Date issued
2014-09
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/90961
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Center for Global Change Science
Journal
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH on behalf of the European Geosciences Union
Citation
Meredith, L. K., R. Commane, J. W. Munger, A. Dunn, J. Tang, S. C. Wofsy, and R. G. Prinn. “Ecosystem Fluxes of Hydrogen: a Comparison of Flux-Gradient Methods.” Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7, no. 9 (2014): 2787–2805.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
1867-8548

Collections
  • MIT Open Access Articles

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.