Optimizing Electrode Configuration for Electrical Impedance Measurements of Muscle via the Finite Element Method
Author(s)Jafarpoor, Mina; Jia Li, Mina; White, Jacob K.; Rutkove, Seward B.
MetadataShow full item record
Electrical impedance myography (EIM) is a technique for the evaluation of neuromuscular diseases, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and muscular dystrophy. In this study, we evaluated how alterations in the size and conductivity of muscle and thickness of subcutaneous fat impact the EIM data, with the aim of identifying an optimized electrode configuration for EIM measurements. Finite element models were developed for the human upper arm based on anatomic data; material properties of the tissues were obtained from rat and published sources. The developed model matched the frequency-dependent character of the data. Of the three major EIM parameters, resistance, reactance, and phase, the reactance was least susceptible to alterations in the subcutaneous fat thickness, regardless of electrode arrangement. For example, a quadrupling of fat thickness resulted in a 375% increase in resistance at 35 kHz but only a 29% reduction in reactance. By further optimizing the electrode configuration, the change in reactance could be reduced to just 0.25%. For a fixed 30 mm distance between the sense electrodes centered between the excitation electrodes, an 80 mm distance between the excitation electrodes was found to provide the best balance, with a less than 1% change in reactance despite a doubling of subcutaneous fat thickness or halving of muscle size. These analyses describe a basic approach for further electrode configuration optimization for EIM.
DepartmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Jafarpoor, Mina, Jia Li, J. K. White, and S. B. Rutkove. “Optimizing Electrode Configuration for Electrical Impedance Measurements of Muscle via the Finite Element Method.” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60, no. 5 (May 2013): 1446–1452.
Author's final manuscript