Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZeng, Yi
dc.contributor.authorAlbertus, Paul
dc.contributor.authorKlein, Reinhardt
dc.contributor.authorChaturvedi, Nalin
dc.contributor.authorKojic, Aleksandar
dc.contributor.authorBazant, Martin Z.
dc.contributor.authorChristensen, Jake
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T20:35:00Z
dc.date.available2014-10-29T20:35:00Z
dc.date.issued2013-07
dc.identifier.issn0013-4651
dc.identifier.issn1945-7111
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/91234
dc.description.abstractMathematical models of batteries which make use of the intercalation of a species into a solid phase need to solve the corresponding mass transfer problem. Because solving this equation can significantly add to the computational cost of a model, various methods have been devised to reduce the computational time. In this paper we focus on a comparison of the formulation, accuracy, and order of the accuracy for two numerical methods of solving the spherical diffusion problem with a constant or non-constant diffusion coefficient: the finite volume method and the control volume method. Both methods provide perfect mass conservation and second order accuracy in mesh spacing, but the control volume method provides the surface concentration directly, has a higher accuracy for a given numbers of mesh points and can also be easily extended to variable mesh spacing. Variable mesh spacing can significantly reduce the number of points that are required to achieve a given degree of accuracy in the surface concentration (which is typically coupled to the other battery equations) by locating more points where the concentration gradients are highest.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. 1122374)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUnited States. Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (Award Number DE-AR0000278)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1149/2.102309jesen_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleEfficient Conservative Numerical Schemes for 1D Nonlinear Spherical Diffusion Equations with Applications in Battery Modelingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationZeng, Y., P. Albertus, R. Klein, N. Chaturvedi, A. Kojic, M. Z. Bazant, and J. Christensen. “Efficient Conservative Numerical Schemes for 1D Nonlinear Spherical Diffusion Equations with Applications in Battery Modeling.” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 160, no. 9 (January 1, 2013): A1565–A1571. © 2013 The Electrochemical Society.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mathematicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorZeng, Yien_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBazant, Martin Z.en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of the Electrochemical Societyen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsZeng, Y.; Albertus, P.; Klein, R.; Chaturvedi, N.; Kojic, A.; Bazant, M. Z.; Christensen, J.en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record