Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTree, Douglas R.
dc.contributor.authorMuralidhar, Abhiram
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Patrick S.
dc.contributor.authorDorfman, Kevin D.
dc.date.accessioned2014-11-03T14:08:51Z
dc.date.available2014-11-03T14:08:51Z
dc.date.issued2013-10
dc.date.submitted2013-08
dc.identifier.issn0024-9297
dc.identifier.issn1520-5835
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/91257
dc.description.abstractThe details surrounding the crossover from wormlike-specific to universal polymeric behavior has been the subject of debate and confusion even for the simple case of a dilute, unconfined wormlike chain. We have directly computed the polymer size, form factor, free energy, and Kirkwood diffusivity for unconfined wormlike chains as a function of molecular weight, focusing on persistence lengths and effective widths that represent single-stranded and double-stranded DNA in a high ionic strength buffer. To do so, we use a chain-growth Monte Carlo algorithm, the pruned-enriched Rosenbluth method (PERM), which allows us to estimate equilibrium and near-equilibrium dynamic properties of wormlike chains over an extremely large range of contour lengths. From our calculations, we find that very large DNA chains (≈1 000 000, base pairs depending on the choice of size metric) are required to reach flexible, swollen nondraining coils. Furthermore, our results indicate that the commonly used model polymer λ-DNA (48 500, base pairs) does not exhibit “ideal” scaling but exists in the middle of the transition to long-chain behavior. We subsequently conclude that typical DNA used in experiments are too short to serve as an accurate model of long-chain, universal polymer behavior.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (U.S.) (Grant 0852235)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01-HG005216)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (R01-HG06851)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Chemical Society (ACS)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma401507fen_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleIs DNA a Good Model Polymer?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationTree, Douglas R., Abhiram Muralidhar, Patrick S. Doyle, and Kevin D. Dorfman. “Is DNA a Good Model Polymer?” Macromolecules 46, no. 20 (October 22, 2013): 8369–8382.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorDoyle, Patrick S.en_US
dc.relation.journalMacromoleculesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsTree, Douglas R.; Muralidhar, Abhiram; Doyle, Patrick S.; Dorfman, Kevin D.en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record