Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcDuff, Daniel Jonathan
dc.contributor.authorEl Kaliouby, Rana
dc.contributor.authorKodra, Evan
dc.contributor.authorPicard, Rosalind W.
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-22T18:06:30Z
dc.date.available2014-12-22T18:06:30Z
dc.date.issued2013-09
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-7695-5048-0
dc.identifier.issn2156-8103
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/92439
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we present the first analysis of facial responses to electoral debates measured automatically over the Internet. We show that significantly different responses can be detected from viewers with different political preferences and that similar expressions at significant moments can have very different meanings depending on the actions that appear subsequently. We used an Internet based framework to collect 611 naturalistic and spontaneous facial responses to five video clips from the 3rd presidential debate during the 2012 American presidential election campaign. Using this framework we were able to collect over 60% of these video responses (374 videos) within one day of the live debate and over 80% within three days. No participants were compensated for taking the survey. We present and evaluate a method for predicting independent voter preference based on automatically measured facial responses and self-reported preferences from the viewers. We predict voter preference with an average accuracy of over 73% (AUC 0.779).en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)en_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACII.2013.67en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleMeasuring Voter's Candidate Preference Based on Affective Responses to Election Debatesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMcDuff, Daniel, Rana El Kaliouby, Evan Kodra, and Rosalind Picard. “Measuring Voter’s Candidate Preference Based on Affective Responses to Election Debates.” 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (September 2013).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Media Arts and Sciences (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMcDuff, Daniel Jonathanen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPicard, Rosalind W.en_US
dc.relation.journalProceedings of the 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interactionen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsMcDuff, Daniel; El Kaliouby, Rana; Kodra, Evan; Picard, Rosalinden_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-0022
dspace.mitauthor.errortrue
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record