Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMalakis, A.
dc.contributor.authorHadjiagapiou, I. A.
dc.contributor.authorFytas, N. G.
dc.contributor.authorBerker, A. Nihat
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-17T14:55:24Z
dc.date.available2015-03-17T14:55:24Z
dc.date.issued2010-02
dc.identifier.issn18753892
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96037
dc.description.abstractWe study, via a two-stage Wang–Landau (WL) strategy, the random-bond version of the square lattice ferromagnetic Blume–Capel (BC) model, in both the first- and second-order phase transition regimes of the pure model. The second-order phase transition, emerging under random bonds from the second-order regime of the pure model, has the same values of critical exponents as the 2d Ising universality class, with the effect of the bond disorder on the specific heat being well described by double-logarithmic corrections. On the other hand, the second-order transition, emerging under bond randomness from the first-order regime of the pure model, has a distinctive universality class with v=1.30(6) and [β over v]=0.128(5). These results amount to a strong violation of universality principle of critical phenomena, since these two second-order transitions, with different sets of critical exponents, are between the same ferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases. Furthermore, the latter of these two sets of results supports an extensive but weak universality, since it has the same magnetic critical exponent (but a different thermal critical exponent) as a wide variety of 2d systems with and without quenched disorder.en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2010.01.204en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en_US
dc.sourceElsevieren_US
dc.titleWang–Landau study of the 2d random-bond Blume–Capel modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationMalakis, A., A. Nihat Berker, I.A. Hadjiagapiou, and N.G. Fytas. “Wang–Landau Study of the 2d Random-Bond Blume–Capel Model.” Physics Procedia 3, no. 3 (February 2010): 1443–1446.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Physicsen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBerker, A. Nihaten_US
dc.relation.journalPhysics Procediaen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsMalakis, A.; Berker, A. Nihat; Hadjiagapiou, I.A.; Fytas, N.G.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5172-2172
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record