Functional equivalence of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor transmitter binding sites in the open state
Author(s)
Tantama, Mathew; Licht, Stuart
DownloadTantama-2009-Functional equivalen.pdf (812.6Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The subunits of the muscle-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) are not uniformly oriented in the resting closed conformation: the two α subunits are rotated relative to its non-α subunits. In contrast, all the subunits overlay well with one another when agonist is bound to the AChR, suggesting that they are uniformly oriented in the open receptor. This gating-dependent increase in orientational uniformity due to rotation of the α subunits might affect the relative affinities of the two transmitter binding sites, making the two affinities dissimilar (functionally non-equivalent) in the initial ligand-bound closed state but similar (functionally equivalent) in the open state. To test this hypothesis, we measured single-channel activity of the αG153S gain-of-function mutant receptor evoked by choline, and estimated the resting closed-state and open-state affinities of the two transmitter binding sites. Both model-independent analyses and maximum-likelihood estimation of microscopic rate constants indicate that channel opening makes the binding sites' affinities more similar to each other. These results support the hypothesis that open-state affinities to the transmitter binding sites are primarily determined by the α subunits.
Date issued
2009-05Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of ChemistryJournal
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
Publisher
Elsevier B.V.
Citation
Tantama, Mathew, and Stuart Licht. “Functional Equivalence of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Transmitter Binding Sites in the Open State.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes 1788, no. 5 (May 2009): 936–944. © 2009 Elsevier B.V.
Version: Final published version
ISSN
00052736