Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaslanger, Sally
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-20T15:49:53Z
dc.date.available2015-05-20T15:49:53Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.issn0031-8116
dc.identifier.issn1573-0883
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/97041
dc.description.abstractIt is a great honor to have such excellent commentary on my book, and I am happy to have the opportunity to discuss these issues with others who have done such important work on the topics. I will reply to the commentaries separately, beginning with the critique by Charles Mills (2013) and moving on to Karen Jones’s (2013).en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlagen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0244-1en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceHaslangeren_US
dc.titleRace, intersectionality, and method: a reply to criticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationHaslanger, Sally. “Race, Intersectionality, and Method: a Reply to Critics.” Philosophical Studies 171, no. 1 (December 21, 2013): 109–119.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.approverHaslanger, Sallyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHaslanger, Sallyen_US
dc.relation.journalPhilosophical Studiesen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsHaslanger, Sallyen_US
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record