Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBharadwaj, Hari M.
dc.contributor.authorMasud, Salwa
dc.contributor.authorMehraei, Golbarg
dc.contributor.authorVerhulst, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorShinn-Cunningham, Barbara G.
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-05T15:31:55Z
dc.date.available2015-08-05T15:31:55Z
dc.date.issued2015-02
dc.date.submitted2014-11
dc.identifier.issn0270-6474
dc.identifier.issn1529-2401
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/98035
dc.description.abstractClinical audiometry has long focused on determining the detection thresholds for pure tones, which depend on intact cochlear mechanics and hair cell function. Yet many listeners with normal hearing thresholds complain of communication difficulties, and the causes for such problems are not well understood. Here, we explore whether normal-hearing listeners exhibit such suprathreshold deficits, affecting the fidelity with which subcortical areas encode the temporal structure of clearly audible sound. Using an array of measures, we evaluated a cohort of young adults with thresholds in the normal range to assess both cochlear mechanical function and temporal coding of suprathreshold sounds. Listeners differed widely in both electrophysiological and behavioral measures of temporal coding fidelity. These measures correlated significantly with each other. Conversely, these differences were unrelated to the modest variation in otoacoustic emissions, cochlear tuning, or the residual differences in hearing threshold present in our cohort. Electroencephalography revealed that listeners with poor subcortical encoding had poor cortical sensitivity to changes in interaural time differences, which are critical for localizing sound sources and analyzing complex scenes. These listeners also performed poorly when asked to direct selective attention to one of two competing speech streams, a task that mimics the challenges of many everyday listening environments. Together with previous animal and computational models, our results suggest that hidden hearing deficits, likely originating at the level of the cochlear nerve, are part of “normal hearing.”en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherSociety for Neuroscienceen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.3915-14.2015en_US
dc.rightsArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.en_US
dc.sourceSociety for Neuroscienceen_US
dc.titleIndividual Differences Reveal Correlates of Hidden Hearing Deficitsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBharadwaj, H. M., S. Masud, G. Mehraei, S. Verhulst, and B. G. Shinn-Cunningham. “Individual Differences Reveal Correlates of Hidden Hearing Deficits.” Journal of Neuroscience 35, no. 5 (February 4, 2015): 2161–2172.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorMehraei, Golbargen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Neuroscienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsBharadwaj, H. M.; Masud, S.; Mehraei, G.; Verhulst, S.; Shinn-Cunningham, B. G.en_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4575-3941
mit.licensePUBLISHER_POLICYen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record