Unintended Consequences of Transportation Carbon Policies: Land-Use, Emissions, and Innovation
Author(s)
Holland, Stephen P.; Hughes, Jonathan E.; Parker, Nathan C.; Knittel, Christopher Roland
DownloadKnittel_Unintended consequences.pdf (2.323Mb)
OPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
Open Access Policy
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike
Alternative title
Unintended Consequences of Carbon Policies: Transportation Fuels, Land-Use, Emissions, and Innovation
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Renewable fuel standards, low carbon fuel standards, and ethanol subsidies are popular policies to incentivize ethanol production and reduce emissions from transportation. Compared to carbon trading, these policies lead to large shifts in agricultural activity and unexpected social costs. We simulate the 2022 Federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and find that energy crop production increases by 39 million acres. Land-use costs from erosion and habitat loss are between $277 and $693 million. A low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) and ethanol subsidies have similar effects while costs under an equivalent cap and trade (CAT) system are essentially zero. In addition, the alternatives to CAT magnify errors in assigning emissions rates to fuels and can over or under-incentivize innovation. These results highlight the potential negative effects of the RFS, LCFS and subsidies, effects that would be less severe under a CAT policy.
Date issued
2015-07Department
Sloan School of ManagementJournal
The Energy Journal
Publisher
International Association for Energy Economics (IAEE)
Citation
Holland, Stephen P., Jonathan E. Hughes, Christopher R. Knittel, and Nathan C. Parker. “Unintended Consequences of Carbon Policies: Transportation Fuels, Land-Use, Emissions, and Innovation.” The Energy Journal 36, no. 3 (July 1, 2015).
Version: Original manuscript
ISSN
01956574