The Investment Strategies of Sovereign Wealth Funds
Author(s)
Bernstein, Shai; Lerner, Josh; Schoar, Antoinette
DownloadSchoar_The investment.pdf (508.3Kb)
PUBLISHER_POLICY
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Sovereign wealth funds have emerged as major investors in corporate and real resources worldwide. After an overview of their magnitude, we consider the institutional arrangements under which many of the sovereign wealth funds operate. We focus on a specific set of agency problems that is of first-order importance for these funds: that is, the direct involvement of political leaders in the management process. We show that sovereign wealth funds with greater involvement of political leaders in fund management are associated with investment strategies that seem to favor short-term economic policy goals in their respective countries at the expense of longer-term maximization of returns. Sovereign wealth funds face several other issues, like how best to cope with demands for transparency, which can allow others to copy their investment strategies, and how to address the problems that arise with sheer size, like the difficulties of scaling up investment strategies that only work with a smaller value of assets under investment. In the conclusion, we discuss how various approaches cultivated by effective institutional investors worldwide -- from investing in the best people to pioneering new asset classes to compartmentalizing investment activities -- may provide clues as to how sovereign wealth funds might address these issues.
Date issued
2013-02Department
Sloan School of ManagementJournal
Journal of Economic Perspectives
Publisher
American Economic Association
Citation
Bernstein, Shai, Josh Lerner, and Antoinette Schoar. “The Investment Strategies of Sovereign Wealth Funds.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 27, no. 2 (February 2013): 219–238. © 2013 American Economic Association
Version: Final published version
ISSN
0895-3309
1944-7965