Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPolat, Baris E.
dc.contributor.authorHart, Douglas
dc.contributor.authorLanger, Robert
dc.contributor.authorBlankschtein, Daniel
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-13T17:51:25Z
dc.date.available2015-10-13T17:51:25Z
dc.date.issued2011-01
dc.date.submitted2010-10
dc.identifier.issn01683659
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/99225
dc.description.abstractThe use of ultrasound for the delivery of drugs to, or through, the skin is commonly known as sonophoresis or phonophoresis. The use of therapeutic and high frequencies of ultrasound (≥ 0.7 MHz) for sonophoresis (HFS) dates back to as early as the 1950s, while low-frequency sonophoresis (LFS, 20–100 kHz) has only been investigated significantly during the past two decades. Although HFS and LFS are similar because they both utilize ultrasound to increase the skin penetration of permeants, the mechanisms associated with each physical enhancer are different. Specifically, the location of cavitation and the extent to which each process can increase skin permeability are quite dissimilar. Although the applications of both technologies are different, they each have strengths that could allow them to improve current methods of local, regional, and systemic drug delivery. In this review, we will discuss the mechanisms associated with both HFS and LFS, specifically concentrating on the key mechanistic differences between these two skin treatment methods. Background on the relevant physics associated with ultrasound transmitted through aqueous media will also be discussed, along with implications of these phenomena on sonophoresis. Finally, a thorough review of the literature is included, dating back to the first published reports of sonophoresis, including a discussion of emerging trends in the field.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant EB-00351)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (Grant DAAD-19-02-D-002)en_US
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.01.006en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivativesen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleUltrasound-mediated transdermal drug delivery: Mechanisms, scope, and emerging trendsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPolat, Baris E., Douglas Hart, Robert Langer, and Daniel Blankschtein. “Ultrasound-Mediated Transdermal Drug Delivery: Mechanisms, Scope, and Emerging Trends.” Journal of Controlled Release 152, no. 3 (June 2011): 330–348.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Chemical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorPolat, Baris E.en_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorHart, Douglasen_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorLanger, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.mitauthorBlankschtein, Danielen_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Controlled Releaseen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dspace.orderedauthorsPolat, Baris E.; Hart, Douglas; Langer, Robert; Blankschtein, Danielen_US
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8924-0849
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7836-415X
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-0492
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CCen_US
mit.metadata.statusComplete


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record